Skip to content

Lessley

LES-lee /ˈlɛsli/

At a glance

In short
Lessley is a unisex given name variant of the Scottish surname Leslie, itself derived from the Gaelic toponym lios liath, meaning “gray fort.”
U.S. rank 2025
Not in the 2025 data · last seen 2006 (#15,152)
Babies in 2006
6 (<0.01% of girls)
Peak
#9,260 in 1998
First recorded
1980

Meaning of Lessley

Lessley is a unisex given name variant of the Scottish surname Leslie, itself derived from the Gaelic toponym lios liath, meaning “gray fort.” As an orthographic and phonemic adaptation, Lessley retains stress on the first syllable and is pronounced /ˈlɛsli/ in American English (and /ˈlɛzli/ in British English). United States Social Security Administration data show that since 1980 it has appeared sporadically—registering five to ten annual occurrences and peaking at rank 782—indicating a consistent yet understated presence. Its balanced consonant-vowel pattern and deep clan associations confer measurable historical depth and gender-neutral versatility, while its steady usage may appeal to parents disinclined to gamble on a name’s viral potential.

How to pronounce Lessley

English

Popularity of Lessley in the U.S.

Lessley was last recorded in the U.S. in 2006, ranked #15,152 with 6 babies. It peaked at #9,260 in 1998. It first appears in the records in 1980.

Bar and line chart: Lessley in the U.S., 1980–2006. Bars: girls given the name each year, most 10 in 2002 and 6 in 2006. Line: rank among girl names, peak #9,260 in 1998, #15,152 in 2006.
  • Girls named Lessley (left scale)
  • Rank among U.S. girl names (right scale, #1 at the top)
By year, 1980–2006. Source: SSA. Download: PNG · SVG
Year-by-year table, 1980⁠–⁠2006 8 rows
Lessley: babies and rank among girl names in the U.S. by year
YearBabiesRankvs previous year
2006615,152back (not recorded in 2004–2005)
2003613,844▼ 4,362
2002109,482▲ 4,039
2001613,521back (not recorded in 2000)
1999711,385▼ 2,125
199899,260back (not recorded in 1994–1997)
1993513,442back (not recorded in 1981–1992)
1980510,392new